How to pitch a journalist when nobody has heard of your startup

  1. Blog
  2. Demand & Channels

By Saroj Jha · September 23, 2026 · 7 min read

Quotation from the article: A pitch is not an announcement. It is a story someone else tells.

The first press pitches I ever sent went nowhere, and looking at them now I understand why. They were announcements. They told a reporter that something had happened at my company and quietly assumed that was interesting to somebody other than me.

A reporter does not need news about you. They need a story their readers will finish. Once I started writing pitches that way, the replies began — not many, but enough, and from the right people.

Short answer: pick three reporters who already cover your buyer's problem, read their recent work, and send each of them a short, specific email that offers a story they could write without you. Say what you can bring to it — data, a customer, a contrarian view — and make the ask small.

Why "we just launched" is not a story

Funding, launches and new hires are company events. They become stories only when they illustrate something a reader cares about: a market shifting, a practice changing, a number that contradicts what everyone assumes.

If you strip your company's name out of the pitch and there is nothing left, there was never a story. That single test has killed more of my drafts than any editor.

Find three reporters, not three hundred

A list you bought is a list everyone else bought. Work the other way round: start from the articles your buyers already read, and find the bylines behind them.

What goes in the opening lines

Assume your email is read on a phone, between two other things, and that the reader decides in seconds. Everything that matters goes above the fold.

Then stop. A pitch that runs past two hundred words is a press release wearing a jacket.

A worked example

Here is an illustrative example — invented company, invented numbers — for a startup selling onboarding software to mid-market HR teams. The company is unknown; the story is not about the company.

The version that gets ignored (illustrative):

Subject: Acme raises $4M to reinvent employee onboarding

Hi — I wanted to share that Acme has raised $4M in seed funding to reinvent onboarding with AI. Our platform helps companies onboard faster and better. Would you be interested in covering the news? Happy to set up a call with our CEO.

Every sentence is about the company. There is no reader in it.

The version that gets a reply (illustrative):

Subject: HR teams are quietly rebuilding onboarding around the first 30 days

Hi Priya — your piece on manager overload in March stayed with me, particularly the line about handover being the weakest point in the whole employee lifecycle.

We work with about forty mid-market HR teams, and in the last two quarters most of them have moved their onboarding programme from ninety days to thirty, mainly because managers cannot sustain the longer version. Two of them will talk on record about what broke and what they replaced it with, and I can share the anonymised programme data behind the shift.

Worth fifteen minutes? If it is easier, I can just send the data and you can decide.

— Saroj

The difference is not the writing. It is that the second one proposes a story about the reader's world, and the company is only the access route to it.

Two constraints matter more than style. Every number you offer must be one you can actually produce, and every customer you name must have agreed beforehand. A reporter who asks for the data and receives an estimate will never open your email again.

What to do when nobody replies

Silence is the normal outcome, and it usually means the story was not right for that person at that time. Send one short follow-up after four or five days and then stop.

Meanwhile, publish the material yourself. The data and the customer story work as a post, a talk or a LinkedIn thread regardless of whether a journalist ever uses them — and published work is what makes the next pitch credible.

How I judge whether it is working

Coverage is the outcome, not the measure, because it is largely outside your control. I track what I can influence:

One thing is worth saying plainly: earned media is slow, and it is a poor substitute for demand you can create on purpose. It compounds credibility rather than filling a pipeline this quarter. Treat it as the second or third channel, never the first.

Sources & further reading

This article describes AAJ's own method and contains no external statistics. The worked example is illustrative and uses invented figures.

More in PR, Partnerships & Events

Part of the PR, Partnerships & Events hub - see all 4 resources on this topic.

Also useful in Brand & Voice, Content, Copy & SEO.