Competitor Audit Case Study (Illustrative)

Illustrative case study — not a specific client. By AAJ.

Sample profile: B2C subscription fitness app.

Background

A mock competitor funnel audit showing how AAJ would dissect a large competitor's public paid/social presence and turn gaps into prioritized fixes for your own funnel.

Modeled results (illustrative)

• 5 High-Impact Gaps Identified
• 4 Priority Fixes
• 90-Day Action Plan

← All Case Studies

Phase 1 — Diagnose

The first step in every AAJ engagement is to replace assumptions with evidence. For an engagement of this shape, the Diagnose phase typically runs two to three weeks and includes a structured funnel audit, three to five customer interviews, a competitor and category scan, an analytics and tracking review, and a positioning and messaging assessment. The goal is to produce a written diagnosis that names the two or three constraints most responsible for the current outcome — not a 60-slide deck.

In this illustrative scenario, the diagnosis would surface clear patterns: messaging that did not match how buyers described the problem, a funnel that lost most volume between two specific stages, and a measurement system that could not attribute outcomes to channels with confidence. Each finding would be tied to a quantifiable cost so leadership could see the size of the opportunity before approving any new spend.

Phase 2 — Design

The Design phase translated the diagnosis into a focused 60 to 90 day plan. AAJ does not produce omnibus strategies. The plan named three priorities, sequenced them by leverage and dependency, and assigned a single owner to each. Each priority had a measurable success criterion, a defined budget envelope, and a checkpoint date. Anything that did not fit those three priorities was explicitly deferred to the next quarter — not abandoned, but parked with a documented rationale.

Design also produced the supporting assets the execution phase would depend on: a tested positioning statement, an updated landing page brief, a creative concept system, a measurement schema, and the dashboard wireframe. Producing these assets in the Design phase — rather than discovering they were missing mid-execution — was the difference between a smooth launch and a stalled one.

Phase 3 — Execute

The Execute phase ran the work. AAJ held the operating rhythm: weekly check-ins on leading indicators, biweekly reviews of lagging indicators, and a monthly steering session with leadership. The in-house team and external partners produced the deliverables; AAJ kept the system honest by surfacing slippage early, killing experiments that were not learning fast enough, and re-prioritizing capacity when a channel showed disproportionate lift.

The modeled results above assume no single tactic does the work: they assume the compound effect of clearer positioning, a tighter funnel, a working measurement system, and a disciplined operating rhythm. They are illustrative figures, not measured client results.

What other teams can learn from this

• Diagnose before designing. Most plateaus are caused by two or three constraints, not by a missing channel.
• Sequence the work. A plan with three named priorities outperforms a plan with twelve every time.
• Instrument first. A measurement system that lags execution by one quarter is a measurement system that does not exist.
• Hold the rhythm. The operating cadence — weekly, biweekly, monthly — is the mechanism that turns a strategy into pipeline.
• Kill experiments quickly. Speed of learning compounds; tolerance for slow experiments does not.

Related playbooks and case studies

• Foundations Playbook — the positioning and ICP work underneath this scenario.
• Analytics & Attribution Playbook — the measurement system this scenario relies on.
• 90-Day Growth Playbook — the compressed sprint format used to operationalize the plan.
• All AAJ case studies
• Talk to AAJ about a similar engagement.